Headline #2: Community Owner to Pay $35,000 to Settle Dispute Over Resident's Pit Bull
The owners and managers of a Midwest community recently agreed to pay $35,000 to settle a lawsu
The owners and managers of a Midwest community recently agreed to pay $35,000 to settle a lawsu
Editor's Note: By far - the largest number of phone calls to the MHCO office - year after year - is assistance animals.
However reasonable your suspicions, it’s necessary to set them aside and handle the request as a request for a reasonable accommodation.
You Make the Call: Did the tenant have a valid claim for refusing to make reasonable accommodations?
Answer: Yes
Spot the Discrimination Mistake
Situation: A condo association with a no-pets policy lets a tenant keep two service dogs to accommodate his disability. After several years of good behavior, the dogs turn into incessant barkers who disturb their neighbors. The association orders the tenant to get rid of them or face eviction.
You Make the Call: Did the association violate its FHA duty to accommodate the tenant?
Question: Our community is having more and more residents who are trying to bring in dogs or other animals as “assistance” or “service” to get around signing the Pet Agreement or paying pet fees. We also have some that bring in pets that are under the weight limit as puppies, but not as adults. What can be done? And what about those breeds of dogs that have a reputation for being vicious, that residents claim are for their emotional support? Do we, as landlords, have any recourse to require residents to get rid of their animals, as they are abusing the system to circumvent our size requirements?