Search

Financing Your Community

Financing Your Community  

By:  J. DiMarco and Gerard D. DiMarco

Almost every community owner at some point in time will experience the need for financing of some kind. There have been many ups, downs, and complexities of the financial markets over the past 25 years, and the impact these fluctuations have had on available loans has been huge. In this article we will address some of the important issues that community owners may face during the lending process.

 

Lenders are back after the credit crunch of a few years ago

 

Since the financial crisis that began around 2007, the capital markets began to slowly re-emerge in late 2010 and early 201 for manufactured home community lending on a wide scale. Today's lending market, combined with historically low interest rates, is the strongest it has been in years. Lenders are eager to provide long term fixed rate, non-recourse loans with 30 year amortizations on manufactured home communities. We are currently helping a customer refinance a five year commercial mortgage-backed security (CMBS) loan that closed in March 2010 (our records indicate it was one of the nation's first CMBS loan post financial crisis) with a ten year fixed rate loan at less than 4.25%. The existing loan the borrower is paying off had a rate of 6.5%.

 

A few other real world examples include recently helping a client lock a ten year fixed rate loan at 3.51%! Additionally, another client just secured a 4.2% long term fixed rate, replacing a rate of 6.5% from the previous note. The market has improved dramatically!

 

There are currently numerous lending platforms and options available for community owners including conduit lenders (CMBS), life insurance companies, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, credit unions, and traditional bank loans. There are also a wide range of product options and features available in today's financial market including bridge lending, short term floating rate debt, interest only, mezzanine debt, and flexible prepayment options. With so many options available, finding loan that suits your specific needs as a manufactured community owner is possible.

 

How to obtain a mortgage

 

There are two major components that lenders review when analyzing a loan request; the guarantor, and the property itself. On the guarantor side, most lenders look for an individual to have a credit score of at least 600 and a sufficient net worth. Even though most of the loans we offer are non-recourse, our lenders still look for those minimum requirements. On the property side, as a general rule, our lenders require a minimum loan amount of $500,000, a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.25x, and paved roads. There are also numerous aspects to manufactured home communities that make them unique compared to other asset classes.

 

Every community can qualify for a loan!

 

We have financed deals with low occupancies, private utilities, and low populations. However, having a better understanding of what lenders prefer can be helpful in assessing your property, or a potential acquisition, in preparation for a new loan. The type of loan and benefits of the mortgage depend on the checklist" of items a lender reviews. Some of the key components that determine the rate and terms of a loan include:

 

  • Community quality
  • Borrower experience and equity
  • Loan-to-value (LTV)
  • Financial and occupancy trends of the property
  • Infrastructure quality - roads

Financing Your Community

Financing Your Community

 

Feature Article: Anthony J. DiMarco and Gerard D. DiMarco

 

Almost every community owner at some point in time will experience the need for financing of some kind. There have been many ups, downs, and complexities of the financial markets over the past 25 years, and the impact these fluctuations have had on available loans has been huge. In this article we will address some of the important issues that community owners may face during the lending process.

 

Lenders are back after the credit crunch of a few years ago

 

Since the financial crisis that began around 2007, the capital markets began to slowly re-emerge in late 2010 and early 201 for manufactured home community lending on a wide scale. Today's lending market, combined with historically low interest rates, is the strongest it has been in years. Lenders are eager to provide long term fixed rate, non-recourse loans with 30 year amortizations on manufactured home communities. We are currently helping a customer refinance a five year commercial mortgage-backed security (CMBS) loan that closed in March 2010 (our records indicate it was one of the nation's first CMBS loan post financial crisis) with a ten year fixed rate loan at less than 4.25%. The existing loan the borrower is paying off had a rate of 6.5%.

 

A few other real world examples include recently helping a client lock a ten year fixed rate loan at 3.51%! Additionally, another client just secured a 4.2% long term fixed rate, replacing a rate of 6.5% from the previous note. The market has improved dramatically!

 

There are currently numerous lending platforms and options available for community owners including conduit lenders (CMBS), life insurance companies, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, credit unions, and traditional bank loans. There are also a wide range of product options and features available in today's financial market including bridge lending, short term floating rate debt, interest only, mezzanine debt, and flexible prepayment options. With so many options available, finding loan that suits your specific needs as a manufactured community owner is possible.

 

How to obtain a mortgage

 

There are two major components that lenders review when analyzing a loan request; the guarantor, and the property itself. On the guarantor side, most lenders look for an individual to have a credit score of at least 600 and a sufficient net worth. Even though most of the loans we offer are non-recourse, our lenders still look for those minimum requirements. On the property side, as a general rule, our lenders require a minimum loan amount of $500,000, a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.25x, and paved roads. There are also numerous aspects to manufactured home communities that make them unique compared to other asset classes.

 

Every community can qualify for a loan!

 

We have financed deals with low occupancies, private utilities, and low populations. However, having a better understanding of what lenders prefer can be helpful in assessing your property, or a potential acquisition, in preparation for a new loan. The type of loan and benefits of the mortgage depend on the checklist" of items a lender reviews. Some of the key components that determine the rate and terms of a loan include:

 

  • Community quality
  • Borrower experience and equity
  • Loan-to-value (LTV)
  • Financial and occupancy trends of the property
  • Infrastructure quality - roads

Financing Your Community

Financing Your Community

 

Feature Article: Anthony J. DiMarco and Gerard D. DiMarco

 

Almost every community owner at some point in time will experience the need for financing of some kind. There have been many ups, downs, and complexities of the financial markets over the past 25 years, and the impact these fluctuations have had on available loans has been huge. In this article we will address some of the important issues that community owners may face during the lending process.

 

Lenders are back after the credit crunch of a few years ago

 

Since the financial crisis that began around 2007, the capital markets began to slowly re-emerge in late 2010 and early 201 for manufactured home community lending on a wide scale. Today's lending market, combined with historically low interest rates, is the strongest it has been in years. Lenders are eager to provide long term fixed rate, non-recourse loans with 30 year amortizations on manufactured home communities. We are currently helping a customer refinance a five year commercial mortgage-backed security (CMBS) loan that closed in March 2010 (our records indicate it was one of the nation's first CMBS loan post financial crisis) with a ten year fixed rate loan at less than 4.25%. The existing loan the borrower is paying off had a rate of 6.5%.

 

A few other real world examples include recently helping a client lock a ten year fixed rate loan at 3.51%! Additionally, another client just secured a 4.2% long term fixed rate, replacing a rate of 6.5% from the previous note. The market has improved dramatically!

 

There are currently numerous lending platforms and options available for community owners including conduit lenders (CMBS), life insurance companies, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, credit unions, and traditional bank loans. There are also a wide range of product options and features available in today's financial market including bridge lending, short term floating rate debt, interest only, mezzanine debt, and flexible prepayment options. With so many options available, finding loan that suits your specific needs as a manufactured community owner is possible.

 

How to obtain a mortgage

 

There are two major components that lenders review when analyzing a loan request; the guarantor, and the property itself. On the guarantor side, most lenders look for an individual to have a credit score of at least 600 and a sufficient net worth. Even though most of the loans we offer are non-recourse, our lenders still look for those minimum requirements. On the property side, as a general rule, our lenders require a minimum loan amount of $500,000, a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.25x, and paved roads. There are also numerous aspects to manufactured home communities that make them unique compared to other asset classes.

 

Every community can qualify for a loan!

 

We have financed deals with low occupancies, private utilities, and low populations. However, having a better understanding of what lenders prefer can be helpful in assessing your property, or a potential acquisition, in preparation for a new loan. The type of loan and benefits of the mortgage depend on the checklist" of items a lender reviews. Some of the key components that determine the rate and terms of a loan include:

 

  • Community quality
  • Borrower experience and equity
  • Loan-to-value (LTV)
  • Financial and occupancy trends of the property
  • Infrastructure quality - roads

Mark Busch: COVID-19 Update for Landlords

This article is general in nature and is not intended as legal advice for any specific issue that might arise, since every situation is different. Always consult a knowledgeable landlord attorney with your specific legal issues.

The Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court issued a statewide Order yesterday significantly restricting court operations in all counties beginning no later than March 19, 2020. All eviction case 1st appearance hearings and all eviction trials will be automatically postponed and rescheduled by the court through at least March 27, 2020, although subject to extension even beyond that date depending on conditions at the time. For postponed trials, landlords may file a motion with the court requesting that the tenant pay rent into court pending trial, although the court will have discretion on whether to grant any such motion.

The Chief Justice’s Order does not prohibit landlords from issuing eviction notices or filing eviction cases during this period (BUT SEE Multnomah County restrictions below). However, any new eviction cases filed during this time will not be set for a 1st appearance hearing until after March 27, 2020, and likely much longer after that date.

The Order allows each county court to decide for itself which in-person services it must continue to provide to the public. This means that each court has some discretion on whether to allow in-person filings, or to continue issuing Notices of Restitution and Writs of Execution to complete the eviction process on existing eviction cases. Landlords should check with their local circuit court to see if these eviction services will be offered during the shutdown (and check with the county sheriff’s office as well).

Multnomah County today issued a temporary moratorium on all residential evictions based on the nonpayment of rent due to wage loss resulting from COVID-19. To be eligible, an affected tenant must be able to demonstrate with documentation or other objectively verifiable means a “substantial loss of income” resulting from the pandemic and/or government restrictions. The tenant must notify the landlord with this information on or before the day that rent is due to be eligible for rent deferment. The tenant is not relieved from paying rent, but must pay accrued rent to the landlord within six months after expiration of this emergency (and landlords cannot assess late fees).

The Multnomah County moratorium does NOT prohibit landlords from issuing or filing eviction cases on for-cause eviction notices or other lawful (non-rent related) notices during this period. However, all court hearings on eviction proceedings will be suspended until April 30th or later, and the moratorium prohibits the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office from executing on a currently-pending eviction judgments for nonpayment of rent if it would cause a person to be without housing. The Multnomah County Attorney will be drafting an ordinance that will impose retroactive fines and penalties for violation of the moratorium measures. SINCE THIS IS A FLUID SITUATION, LANDLORDS SHOULD CHECK WITH YOUR LOCAL CIRCUIT COURT AND/OR ATTORNEY BEFORE PROCEEDING ON ANY EVICTION ACTION.

MEASURE TO PRESERVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE MANUFACTURED HOUSING CLEARS KEY HURDLE IN U.S. HOUSE

The House Financial Services Committee Passes Bipartisan Legislation to Protect the Availability of Financing for Manufactured Homes (Editor's Note: As mentioned in the earlier article with the passage of similar legislation pending in the US Senate, MHCO is working with the Oregon Congressional delegation to ensure passage of this critical legislation.)

Washington, DC - The U.S. House Financial Services Committee today passed the bipartisan Preserving Access to Manufactured Housing Act (H.R. 1779) to protect the ability of manufactured home customers to buy, sell and refinance affordable manufactured homes, the largest form of unsubsidized affordable housing in the nation. Specifically, the bill would amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) to address the criteria by which home loans are classified "high-cost" while keeping in place strong consumer protections. Sponsored by Representatives Stephen Fincher (R-TN), Bennie Thompson (D-MS), and Gary Miller (R-CA), the bill is also supported and cosponsored by an additional 110 House Members on both sides of the aisle.

"The ability to access affordable manufactured homes is vital to millions of low- and moderate-income Americans, and our industry is also an important economic driver and job creator in many communities across the country," said Nathan Smith, Chairman of the Manufactured Housing Institute. "This legislation would ensure that manufactured housing remains a viable affordable housing option, particularly in rural, distressed and underserved areas. We urge the full House of Representative to move swiftly to consider this important legislation." The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), through a rulemaking process required under Dodd-Frank, deemed that all purchase loans-including mortgages on manufactured homes considered personal property-be covered by the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA). Under these guidelines, many small-balance loans used for the purchase of affordable manufactured housing are now unfairly classified as predatory and high-cost. Unfortunately, the CFPB failed to recognize the uniqueness of manufactured home loans compared to the rest of the housing industry.

While the cost of originating and servicing a $250,000 loan and a $25,000 loan are the same in terms of real dollars, the cost as a percentage of each loan's size is significantly different. This difference causes the smaller-sized manufactured home loan to potentially exceed the new thresholds and be categorized as a HOEPA high-cost loan.

Due to the increased lender liabilities associated with making a HOEPA high-cost loan, it is unlikely that these loans will be offered to homebuyers, denying access to necessary credit for new and existing manufactured homes. In fact, industry lenders have already stopped originating loans of less than $20,000 as a result of the new rule. According to the American Housing Survey, roughly half of the nation's 8.5 million manufactured homes have a purchase price of less than $30,000.

Manufactured home loans perform just as well, if not better, than loans on site-built counterparts and are serviced in a responsible and consumer-friendly manner. This is evidenced by delinquency rates among manufactured housing lenders that are half of what is reported in the larger mortgage market.

Eliminating this important source of financing would unfairly penalize low and moderate-income homebuyers who do not qualify for traditional mortgage financing needed for single family home ownership; do not have access to limited government-insured and GSE secondary market programs; or live in rural areas where affordable rental housing is scarce or non-existent. Additionally, millions of families could see the equity they have diligently built up in their manufactured homes wiped out because lenders would be unwilling to provide the financing needed for resale.

"Homeowners who purchased safe, energy efficient homes that they can afford rather than taking out a loan they could not pay back should not be punished, and we are thankful so many lawmakers have backed this effort to protect the more than 22 million Americans living in manufactured homes," added Smith.

The bipartisan legislation would also clarify that manufactured home retailers and salespersons would not be considered loan originators unless they receive compensation from a lender, mortgage broker or loan originator. The new CFPB definition of a loan originator is based on traditional mortgage market roles that do not equate with the business model of the manufactured housing industry, including lending and retail sales practices.

A similar bipartisan bill has been introduced in the Senate, the Preserving Access to Manufactured Housing Act of 2013 (S. 1828), by Senators Joe Donnelly (D-IN) and Tom Coburn (R-OK).

Checklist for Managers When Resident Living Alone Dies

MHCO

Answer: Under ORS 90.675(20), death of a resident living alone triggers the abandonment procotols.

  1. First you need to determine if there is a personal representative ("PR") named in a will or appointed by a court to act for the deceased tenant. If not, is there a person designated in writing by the tenant to be contacted in the event of their death. (Of course, the best practice is to have this information, in advance, for all residents living alone.)
  2. If you do not have any contact information, you may have to do some research, which means checking the decedent's rental application, or checking with neighbors. My experience is that when an older person passes away, relatives and others come out of the woodwork. Eventually you will need to identify some person who is willing to assume responsibility for the decedent's property.
  3. There is such a thing as a Small Estate Probate, and most counties have the available forms. That would be the best approach for the responsible person to go through.
  4. However, note that as a landlord/manager, your job is to get the space re-rented, either by a sale of the home to an approved resident, or removal of the home and re-siting of another.
  5. The 45-day abandonment letter must be sent by first class mail to the deceased tenant at the premises, and personally delivered or sent by first class mail to the PR or designated person, if actually known to you. (Note: The 45-day letter must refer to the personal representative or designated person, instead of the deceased tenant.)
  6. If the PR or designated person, or other person entitled to possession of the property, such as an heir, responds to you by actual notice (E.g. verbal contact, phone call, email, fax, etc.) within the 45-day period set forth in the 45-day letter, and requests to enter into a written Storage Agreement, you must do so.
  7. The written Storage Agreement should provide that the home and personal property may not be sold or disposed of for up to 90 days, or until the conclusion of any probate proceedings, whichever is later.
  8. The written Storage Agreement entitles the PR or designated person to store the personal property on the space during the term of the agreement, but does not entitle anyone to occupy the home. You should secure it, even if it means changing the current locks. You duty commences the moment you send the 45-day letter.
  9. If a written Storage Agreement is signed by yourself and the responsible party, you may not enter into another such agreement with the lienholder until the signed until the agreement with the personal representative or designated person ends.
  10. During the term of the Storage Agreement, the PR or designated person has the right to remove or sell the home and personal property (including a sale to a purchaser, or a transfer to an heir who wishes to leave it on the rented space and become a tenant - subject to the approval of background information that you have as a landlord or manager under ORS 90.680).
  11. You may condition approval for occupancy of any purchaser or heir upon payment of all unpaid storage charges and maintenance costs.
  12. If the PR or designated person violates the signed Storage Agreement, you may terminate it by giving at least 30 days written notice stating facts sufficient to notify him/her of the reason for the termination. Unless the PR or designated person corrects the violation within the 30-day period, the Storage Agreement will be terminated, and you may sell or dispose of the home and property without further notice to them.
  13. Upon the failure of a PR or designated person to enter into a written Storage Agreement, or upon termination of the Storage Agreement, you may sell or dispose of the property pursuant to the statute (ORS 90.675) without further notice to them (unless the parties otherwise agree, or the PR or designated has already sold or removed the property).


Phil Querin Q&A: Park Owners Selling Formerly Abandoned Homes

Phil Querin

Answer. Oregon law requires that unless exempted, an individual must use a "mortgage loan originator" ("MLO") [e.g. mortgage bankers or mortgage brokers] license if he/she:

  • Takes a residential mortgage loan application; or
  • Negotiates the terms or conditions of a residential mortgage loan.

It is the second of these two requirements that affect you as a park owner re-selling formerly abandoned homes. You must either use a MLO or be covered by an exemption. However, as you will see under the Oregon MLO laws below, the statute is not limited only to "abandoned homes" - just "previously owned homes."


The Safe Act. The federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Lending Act ("S.A.F.E. Act") of 2008 requires that MLOs register with the Oregon Department of Business and Consumer Services ("DCBS"). As required by the S.A.F.E. Act, all states must adopt their own set of laws governing MLOs. Oregon's version is found at ORS 86A.200 to 86A.239. The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB"), a Dodd- Frank created mega-agency, and DCBS have taken the position that the S.A.F.E. Act applies not only to third-party loans, but also to seller-carried transactions, including manufactured homes both inside and outside of parks.


Oregon MLO Laws. An individual may not engage in business as a mortgage loan originator in Oregon without first:


Oregon Exemptions to MLO Laws:

  • A registered MLO acting within the scope of their employment;
  • One who offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan with or on behalf of the individual's spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandparent, grandchild or a relative in a similar relationship with the individual that is created by law, marriage or adoption;
  • One who offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan that is secured by a dwelling that served as the individual's residence;
  • An Oregon-licensed attorney [subject to limitations]:
  • An individual licensed as a manufactured structure dealer under ORS 446.691 and who:
    • Offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan related to a sale for occupancy of a previously owned manufactured dwelling in a manufactured dwelling park three (3) or fewer times in any 12- month period; and
    • Uses a written sale agreement form with the purchaser that: (a) complies with the requirements of ORS 646A.050, 646A.052 and 646A.054; (b) with any applicable administrative rules; and (c) any other applicable requirements for residential mortgages for manufactured dwellings.
    • Note: This exemption does not permit the individual to hold more than eight (8) residential mortgage loans at any one time.
  • An individual who is licensed as a limited manufactured structure dealer, and who:
    • Has an ownership interest in a manufactured dwelling park;
    • Offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan related to a sale for occupancy of a previously owned manufactured dwelling in any manufactured dwelling park in which the individual has an ownership interest, five (5) or fewer times in any 12-month period; and
    • Uses a written sale agreement form with the purchaser that: (a) complies with the requirements of ORS 646A.050, 646A.052 and 646A.054, (b) with any applicable administrative rules, and (c) with any other applicable requirements for residential mortgages for manufactured dwellings.
    • This exemption does not permit the individual to hold more than twelve (12) residential mortgage loans at any one time.
  • An employee of a licensed manufactured structure dealer is not subject to the MLO licensing requirements if the employee:
    • Performs only administrative or clerical tasks; and
    • Receives only a salary or commission that is customary among dealers and employees of dealers.
  • An employee of a dealer may become subject to the licensing provisions if the CFPB determines, in a guideline, rule, regulation or interpretive letter that this exemption granted is inconsistent with requirements set forth in 12 U.S.C. 5101 et. seq. (S.A.F.E. Act)

Phil Querin Q&A - Resident Leaves but Returns Requesting Temp Occupant Status

Phil Querin

Answer: Does the former tenant have issues other than his lack of fiscal responsibility? You could prevent him from being a temporary occupancy based upon prior conduct, etc., but not regarding his failure to pay rent, since "in theory" a temporary occupant is not one who is sharing rent, etc. The statute (ORS 90.275) does not permit you to vet a person's financial/employment status if they want to be a temporary occupant. If the guy has other negative issues, you can decline to put him on a temporary occupancy agreement if they are substantial and material.


The following is a summary of a recent conversation I had with the Fair Housing Council of Oregon on the issue of whether landlords can put "caregivers" on Temporary Occupancy Agreements, rather than putting them on a Rental Agreement (or not putting them on any written agreement - which leaves in doubt their legal status if the Landlord wants them removed from the Community).

  1. If the assistance provider doesn'tqualify based on the background check[1] then you don't have to accept them into the Community;
  2. If they violate rules of the community when they are already in the Community you can require they leave. (Of course if they are not on an Occupancy Agreement, this could mean removing the tenant if the caregiver refuses to leave, and the tenant doesn'tforce them to do so);
  • You can pre-qualify the current tenant as to their need for a care provider, i.e. require a letter or similar proof from a doctor or someone, saying the tenant needs someone 24/7;
  • If they can't provide that proof, then you don't have to allow them into the Community as a care provider (although I can't imagine it would be very hard to obtain such proof);
  • You have to give the current tenant a choice (assuming the person qualifies under the background check), i.e. they can be on an Occupancy Agreement or go onto a Rental Agreement. You can't automatically say, "OK, you must go on an Occupancy Agreement."
  • It is believed that if the tenant understands the risk of allowing the caregiver to be a tenant (i.e. if the caregiver is disruptive, the current tenant may have to leave also), that they will voluntarily opt to put the person on the Occupancy Agreement. (Note: This doesn'taddress the problem where the person doesn'tfinancially qualify to be on the Rental Agreement, but I suspect FHCO would say it's a "reasonable accommodation" by the landlord to waive that financial requirement.) This approach may be slightly unrealistic in those cases in which the tenant wants the caregiver there, and defers to what the caregiver says.

Your alternatives seem to be the following:

  • If the current tenant wants them to be a care provider, can he/she establish its legitimacy? If not, you can say no.
  • If the current tenant wants them as a temporary occupant, and they have been a problem in the park you can say no; I believe this is so, even though they try to go the care provider route.
  • If the current tenant wants them as a "tenant" you can say no because they do not have the financial capacity to pay rent (remember, you couldn'tsay that if they were to be a temporary occupant).
  • If you do agree to make them a temporary occupant, have everyone sign the Temporary Occupancy Agreement and put him on a 3 or 6 month term, to see how it goes. You are under no obligation to renew - but if they are serving as a care provider on a Temporary Occupancy Agreement, you'd probably have difficulty not renewing unless there was a specific problem. (But if there was a specific problem, you likely would have already removed them. Getting temporary occupants must be "for cause" e.g. a rules violation, but there is no 30-day right to cure.)

[1] Remember, you cannot require financial capacity if they are to be a temporary occupant, but you can if they are to be a tenant.

Phil Querin Q&A: Changes in Regulations Dealing with Ability To Sell Formerly Abandoned Homes

Phil Querin

Answer. Oregon law requires that unless exempted, an individual must use a "mortgage loan originator" ("MLO") [e.g. mortgage bankers or mortgage brokers] license if he/she:
- Takes a residential mortgage loan application; or
- Negotiates the terms or conditions of a residential mortgage loan.

It is the second of these two requirements that affect you as a park owner re-selling formerly abandoned homes. You must either use a MLO or be covered by an exemption. However, as you will see under the Oregon MLO laws below, the statute is not limited only to "abandoned homes" - just "previously owned homes."

The Safe Act. The federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Lending Act ("S.A.F.E. Act") of 2008 requires that MLOs register with the Oregon Department of Business and Consumer Services ("DCBS"). As required by the S.A.F.E. Act, all states must adopt their own set of laws governing MLOs. Oregon's version is found at ORS 86A.200 to 86A.239. The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB"), a Dodd- Frank created mega-agency, and DCBS have taken the position that the S.A.F.E. Act applies not only to third-party loans, but also to seller-carried transactions, including manufactured homes both inside and outside of parks.

Oregon MLO Laws. An individual may not engage in business as a mortgage loan originator in Oregon without first:
- Obtaining and maintaining a MLO license; and
- Obtaining a unique identifier from the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry ("NMLS").

Exemptions to MLO Laws:
- A registered MLO acting within the scope of their employment;
- One who offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan with or on behalf of the individual's spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandparent, grandchild or a relative in a similar relationship with the individual that is created by law, marriage or adoption;
- One who offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan that is secured by a dwelling that served as the individual's residence;
- An Oregon-licensed attorney [subject to limitations]:
- An individual licensed as a manufactured structure dealer under ORS 446.691 and who:
o Offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan related to a sale for occupancy of a previously owned manufactured dwelling in a manufactured dwelling park three (3) or fewer times in any 12- month period; and
o Uses a written sale agreement form with the purchaser that: (a) complies with the requirements of ORS 646A.050, 646A.052 and 646A.054; (b) with any applicable administrative rules; and (c) any other applicable requirements for residential mortgages for manufactured dwellings.
o Note: This exemption does not permit the individual to hold more than eight (8) residential mortgage loans at any one time.
- An individual who is licensed as a limited manufactured structure dealer, and who:
o Has an ownership interest in a manufactured dwelling park;
o Offers or negotiates terms of a residential mortgage loan related to a sale for occupancy of a previously owned manufactured dwelling in any manufactured dwelling park in which the individual has an ownership interest, five (5) or fewer times in any 12-month period; and
o Uses a written sale agreement form with the purchaser that: (a) complies with the requirements of ORS 646A.050, 646A.052 and 646A.054, (b) with any applicable administrative rules, and (c) with any other applicable requirements for residential mortgages for manufactured dwellings.
o This exemption does not permit the individual to hold more than twelve (12) residential mortgage loans at any one time.
- An employee of a licensed manufactured structure dealer is not subject to the MLO licensing requirements if the employee:
o Performs only administrative or clerical tasks; and
o Receives only a salary or commission that is customary among dealers and employees of dealers.
- An employee of a dealer may become subject to the licensing provisions if the CFPB determines, in a guideline, rule, regulation or interpretive letter that this exemption granted is inconsistent with requirements set forth in 12 U.S.C. 5101 et. seq. (S.A.F.E. Act)

Pets, Service and Comfort Animals--They're Different Under the Americans with Disability Act and Fair Housing Amendment Act?

Robert G. Williamson, Jr.

ADA

Under revised ADA regulations, a "service animal" is any dog individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability. The work or task performed by the service animal has to be directly related to the handler's disability.2 The service animal fulfills what the regulations refer to as "recognition and response" tasks and is distinguish from animals that provide emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship. The key under ADA is that the animal must be specifically trained to "recognize and respond" a disabled person's certain mental or physical condition, e.g., a diabetic's dog may be trained to notice when the person's blood sugar reaches critical levels and alert the person.3 The ADA service animal test makes no reference to a dog's breed, size or weight, any required professional training or certification or registration or required wearing of a vest, patch or special harness. (Same under FHAA) The DOJ suggests that these are not factors in determining ADA compliance. A so called service animal certification or registration documents that can be obtained online confer no rights under ADA and are not recognized by the DOJ as proof that a dog is a "service animal." 4 On the other hand, DOJ notes that a service animal may be required under local law to be licensed and vaccinated.5

 

In determining whether an animal meets the ADA service animal test community management may make only two inquires of the disabled person: (1) Is this a service animal that is required because of a disability? and (2) What work or tasks has the animal been trained to perform? Management may not require documentation proving the animal has been "certified," trained or licensed as a service animal. Further, these inquiries cannot be made if it is readily apparent that an animal is trained to do work or perform tasks for an individual with a disability (for example, an individual is using a dog to assist with vision, or the dog is pulling a person's wheel chair or is providing stability or balance for a person with an observable mobility disability). A "no" answer to no. 1 renders ADA inapplicable, likewise if the task described is unrelated to a disability or is a "non-response" type task. In such cases the answers may drift into areas which must then be assessed under FHAA regulations pertaining to reasonable accommodations for support or comfort animals, discussed below.

 

 

Can management ask a disabled person to remove an ADA qualified service animal from the community? No... unless, the animal is out of control to the extent the handler is unable to control it or the animal is not house broken or based on an individualized assessment of animal's actual conduct the animal poses a direct threat to the health and safety of other residents that cannot be mitigated by other means.6 (Same under FHAA) Community rules or guidelines governing "pet" conduct therefore, should be written to apply to "animals" not simply "pets" which make it clear the community may enforce its rules or guidelines to remove a problematic service animal according to ADA standards.

 

 

Finally, ADA applies to places of public accommodation. Manufactured home communities and mobile home parks experiencing a HUD or DOJ ADA violation charge have contended that as private property not open to the public ADA is inapplicable. However, it's well established under the regulations and case law that an area within a mobile home community (usually office or clubhouse), apartment complex or condominiums where sales and leasing activities are conducted with members of the general public and areas such as parking lots or spaces that serve these areas are within the definition of a public accommodation subject to ADA. Does this mean the entire community is then a public accommodation? No. However, U.S. District Courts in Arizona and California have held that allegations of a mobile home park hosting and conducting Bingo in the park clubhouse where the public was invited or where estate, garage or rummage sales were conducted in the community where the public was invited could state a claim under ADA that the community was a place of public accommodation. The take away... do not allow the general public to be invited

 

to attend events conducted in your community or risk becoming "a place of public accommodation."

FHAA

FHAA prohibits discrimination in housing and housing related mattes based on a person's disability defined as: (1) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, or (2) a record of having such impairment . . . . 7The FHAA's definition of prohibited discrimination encompasses "a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling." 8 This applies to assistance animals that may not satisfy the ADA definition of a "service animal" but nevertheless provide emotional support, comfort, well-being or companionship for a disabled person seeking an exception to a community's "no pet" or "restrictive pet" rules or guidelines.

 

Generally, an "assistance or emotional support animal" is a "companion animal" that provides a therapeutic benefit by alleviating or mitigating some symptom caused by an individual's mental or psychiatric disability as confirmed by a professional health care provider. Unlike ADA, these animals require no specific "recognition and response" training and management may ask the person for documentation of a disability and disability related need for the assistance animal, but may not request access to medical records or medical providers or to provide detailed or extensive information or documentation of the persons physical or mental impairments. These animals are not limited to dogs but may be any other animal within reason if the person requesting the accommodation has a confirmed disability supported by a medical professional.9

 

 

Thus, prohibited conduct under FHAA is refusing to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford a person with a disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. A request for a reasonable accommodation may be denied only if providing the accommodation is unreasonable, defined as imposing an undue financial and administrative burden on the community or if it would fundamentally alter the nature of the community's operations. This could include a denial based on increased liability insurance costs if an "aggressive dog breed" were allowed in the community thus potentially creating an undue financial burden.

 

 

Requests for a reasonable accommodation regarding assistance animals must be evaluated objectively and thoroughly through an interactive process with the person requesting the accommodation. Each request should be evaluated on a "case by case basis" promptly and fairly, on its own facts. Naturally, if questions arise, consult the community's counsel, especially regarding state law that may parallel ADA and FHAA or be more expansive in coverage regarding definitions of service and assistance animals. The above is not intended as legal advice but offered as general information. Consult your legal counsel for specific questions or issues regarding your particular communities.

 

Robert G. Williamson, Jr. is partner with Hart King. He represents manufactured home community owners and managers with their various legal issues including FHA and ADA compliance issues. He may be reached at rwilliamson@hartkinglaw.com or at 714.432.8700

 

1 Set forth in HUD's Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Notice

 

(FHEO-2013-01) issued April 25, 2013 ("HUD Notice").

2 28 C.F.R. _ 36.104

3 DOJ, Frequently Asked Questions about Service Animals and

ADA, July 20, 2015, www.ADA.gov.

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid.

6 28 C.F.R. _ 36.302(c); HUD Notice, supra., fn. 1.

7 42 U.S.C. _ 3602(h)

8 Giebeler v. M&B Associates, 343 F.3d 1143, 1146-47 (9th Cir.

2003); 42 U.S.C. _ 3604(f)(3)(B).

9 HUD Notice.