Search

Answer. Here is a summary of what you can and cannot do. The statute is found at ORS 90.725.

1. A landlord or a landlord's agent may enter onto a rented space, not including the tenant's manufactured dwelling or floating home or an accessory building or structure, in order to:

• Inspect
• Make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations or improvements, supply necessary or agreed services, perform agreed yard maintenance, equipment servicing or grounds keeping or exhibit the space to prospective or actual purchasers of the facility, mortgagees, tenants, workers or contractors.

1. The right of access of the landlord or landlord's agent is limited as follows:

• Serving notices
• Emergencies
• Tenant-requested repairs or maintenance
• Per a written yard maintenance agreement that requires the landlord to perform yard maintenance, equipment servicing or grounds-keeping for the space:

1. In all other cases, unless there is an agreement between the landlord and the tenant to the contrary regarding a specific entry, the landlord shall give the tenant at least 24 hours' actual notice (doesn'thave to be in writing, but recommended unless exempted under No. 2, above) of the intent of the landlord to enter and the landlord or landlord's agent may enter only at reasonable times.

1. The landlord or landlord's agent may not enter if the tenant, after receiving the landlord's notice, denies consent to enter. The tenant must assert this denial of consent by giving actual notice of the denial to the landlord or the landlord's agent prior to, or at the time of, the attempt by the landlord or landlord's agent to enter.

1. A landlord shall not abuse the right of access or use it to harass the tenant. A tenant shall not unreasonably withhold consent from the landlord to enter.

1. A landlord has no other right of access except:

• Pursuant to court order;
• As permitted by ORS 90.410 (2) (Waiver of termination of tenancy);
• As permitted under ORS 90.539 (Entry to read submeter); or
• When the tenant has abandoned or relinquished the premises.

1. If the tenant refuses to allow lawful access, the landlord may obtain injunctive relief to compel access or may terminate the rental agreement pursuant to ORS 90.630 (1) and take possession in the manner provided in ORS 105.105 to 105.168 (Oregon eviction statutes). In addition, the landlord may recover actual damages.

1. If the landlord makes an unlawful entry or a lawful entry in an unreasonable manner or makes repeated demands for entry otherwise lawful but that have the effect of unreasonably harassing the tenant, the tenant may obtain injunctive relief to prevent the reoccurrence of the conduct or may terminate the rental agreement pursuant to ORS 90.620 (1) (Termination by tenant). In addition, the tenant may recover actual damages not less than an amount equal to one month's rent.

Because, while Oregon permits the medical use of marijuana, the Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. _ 801, et seq., says that it is illegal to manufacture, distribute, and possess marijuana, even when state law authorizes its use. Furthermore, federal law supersedes state law where there is a direct conflict between them. So, what does a landlord do when confronted by a card-carrying tenant claiming that he/she cannot be evicted for marijuana use and/or cultivation, because they have a legal right to do so under Oregon law. To second arrow in the tenant's quiver is the threat that "if you try to evict me, I will sue you under the federal Fair Housing laws that say you must grant me a reasonable accommodation [i.e. let me toke on the premises] because I have a "disability." Discussion. Clearly, this is a very complicated issue on several levels. Marijuana is a controlled substance under Federal Law, but under Oregon law, its use and cultivation in limited amounts are lawful with a medical marijuana card. The Oregon laws cover such things as grow-site registration; medical uses for marijuana; issuance of an identification card; and limitations on a cardholder's immunity from criminal laws involving marijuana. For those interested, the specific statutes should be consulted here. Based upon recent news reports, it appears that, subject to certain exceptions, there will be no effort by the federal Department of Justice to seek out and charge violators of the Controlled Substances Act in those states where the medical or recreational use of marijuana are legal. The Conundrum. In short, it appears that when it comes to enforcement of their rules and regulations, Oregon landlords are on their own; neither the feds, nor the state, will go after persons with lawfully issued medical marijuana cards. Furthermore, if a tenant has a valid card, then arguably he or she has some medical condition that has authorized its issuance. Is the landlord obligated under the Fair Housing laws to make a "reasonable accommodation" for their medical condition, and permit the tenant to continue their use or grow operation? If properly done, the answer may be "No." Here's why: In January 20, 2011, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") issued a Memorandum, the subject of which was "Medical Use of Marijuana and Reasonable Accommodation in Federal Public and Assisted Housing." While the Memo was limited to federal public and assisted housing, it can be regarded as a helpful - though perhaps not a "final" resource - on the issue. It is very complete and helpful for all landlords. It can be found at this link. Here is what the Memo directs: Public housing agencies '_in states that have enacted laws legalizing the use of medical marijuana must therefore establish a standard and adopt written policy regarding whether or not to allow continued occupancy or assistance for residents who are medical marijuana users. The decision of whether or not to allow continued occupancy or assistance to medical marijuana users is the responsibility of PHAs, not of the Department." Thus, HUD appears to be leaving it up to the state public housing authorities to decide whether the refusal to permit on-premises use of medical marijuana constitutes a fair housing violation. Between the lines, it appears that HUD will not directly investigate such claims, leaving it up to public housing agencies on the state level. While HUD's pronouncement is directed toward "public housing" is would be hard to believe private housing would be treated any differently. Oregon fair housing law is "substantially equivalent" to federal fair housing law. So, generally speaking, on the issue of medical marijuana, as goes the federal law, so goes state law. However, in the 2010 case of Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, the Oregon Supreme Court held that employers do not have a legal duty to allow employees to use medical marijuana on the job. This case addressed many unanswered questions on the use of medical marijuana in Oregon, both from an employment and housing perspective. Additionally, a subsequent article [found here] by the Fair Housing Council of Oregon is helpful for landlords from the view of private fair housing enforcement. Thus, it appears that in Oregon, on both the federal and state levels, enforcement agencies are [for the time being at least] taking a laissez-faire approach to the medical marijuana issue. This means that landlords have it within their control, with little fear of a fair housing/reasonable accommodation claim, to enact rules and regulations prohibiting the on-premises use of medical marijuana. However, the proscription should not be retroactive to tenants holding legal medical marijuana cards who have already signed their rental agreements or leases. Oregon Landlord-Tenant Laws. Oregon statutes permit landlords to enforce tenant violations of their rental agreements, rules, and general laws [not just the landlord-tenant laws]. It is my belief that the violation of a no medical marijuana policy would be enforceable on a going forward basis. The policy should not be retroactive - and it should so state. In summary, ORS 90.630 [Termination by Landlord] provides as follow: - After delivery of written notice, a landlord may terminate the rental agreement for cause and take possession in accordance with the state eviction laws [ORS 105.105 to 105.168], unless the tenant cures the violation. - Causes for termination are: _ Material violations of the rental agreement; _ Material violation by the tenant of his/her legal duties under [ORS 90.740]; _ Failure to pay rent. - The landlord's notice to the tenant must: _ Specify the acts and omissions constituting the violation; _ State that the rental agreement will terminate upon a designated date not less than 30 days after delivery of the notice; and _ If the violation may be cured under the law, so state and describe at least one possible remedy to cure it, designating the date by which the cure must occur. - If the violation described in the notice can be cured, and is cured by the designated date, the tenancy will not terminate; - If the tenant does not cure the violation, the rental agreement terminates as provided in the notice. - If the cause of a written notice relates to substantially the same act or omission that constituted a prior violation for which notice was given within the previous six months, the designated termination date must be not less than 20 days after delivery of the notice and no earlier than the designated termination date stated in the previously given notice. The tenant does not have a right to cure this subsequent violation. Miscellaneous Tips. Landlords, read the medical marijuana card! It must valid and current for Oregon. A California card, for example, would not suffice. [See, State v. Berrenger, 2010]. If there is no card, or no current card, the growing [not use] of marijuana may still be a violation of Oregon law. In such cases, issuance of a curable 30-day notice under ORS 90.630 may be appropriate. If other tenants are complaining about the odor [and many do], a landlord may consider looking to the "quiet enjoyment" provisions of the rental agreement, the rules, or the provisions in ORS 90.740(4)(i). Conclusion. Rental management companies and individual landlords in Oregon may wish to institute a written medical marijuana policy in their rules and/or rental agreements, dealing both with use and cultivation. Based upon current federal law, it does not appear to be a fair housing violation to prohibit medical marijuana in the landlord's rental agreement or rules. If such a policy exists, it should include management's right to decline a request for a reasonable accommodation. Remember, besides nonpayment of rent, there are only three ways to terminate a tenancy for cause: - Violation of the rental/lease agreement; - Violation of the rules; and - Violation of Oregon laws. This means that in Oregon, if a tenant engages in the legal use or cultivation of marijuana - i.e. with a valid card - doing so is not a violation of state law. If a landlord seeks to prevent such activity, the answer must then be found, if at all, in the rental agreement or the rules. Without an express prohibition contained in one of these documents, it may be difficult to bring an eviction action for legal marijuana use or cultivation - unless the tenant's conduct violates some other rule or provision in the rental agreement.

Answer: There seems to be some confusion on what facts determine giving the 30-day notices and which are appropriate for three strikes. Here is a brief primer:

Three Strikes: Pursuant to ORS 90.630(8), a landlord may terminate a space rental agreement for a manufactured dwelling or floating home if:

• The tenant has not paid the monthly rent prior to the eighth day of the month assuming rent is due on the first day of each month, and,
• A 72-hour notice is issued[1] in at least three of the preceding 12 months; and
• The landlord warns the tenant of the risk of a 30-day notice for termination with no right to correct the cause, upon the occurrence of a third nonpayment of rent termination notice within a 12-month period. This warning must be contained in at least two 72-hour notices that precede the third notice within the 12-month period (or in separate written notices that are given concurrently with, or a reasonable time after, each of the two preceding 72-hour notices); and
• The 30-day notice of termination must state facts sufficient to notify the tenant of the cause for termination of the tenancy which is given to the tenant concurrent with, or after the third or a subsequent nonpayment of rent termination notice.[2]

Take-Aways.

• The MHCO 72-hour Notice (Form No. 42) already contains the warning about a non-curable 30-day notice for three strikes, i.e. issuance of three 72-hour notices within the preceding twelve months. No separate warning needs to be given. All management needs to do is complete the form and identify whether it is the first, second, or third such notice.
• Note: The purpose of the 3-strikes statute is to discourage serial late-paying. The violation is not "cured" by paying the rent late after issuance of a 72-hour notice - in other words, it still counts toward issuance of a three strikes notice.
• The 30-day Notice for a 3-Strikes Violation (Form No. 43A) should be given together with the third 72-hour notice; if it is mailed it can be in the same envelope or another one simultaneously sent. Always get a Certificate of Mailing when mailing the letter. Do not wait in sending out the 30-day notice!
• The 30-day 3-strikes notices is not "cured" by payment of the late rent.
• Since there could potentially be a waiver argument if the landlord attempted to terminate for issuance of more than three 72-hour notices, it is recommended that if the tenant was issued more than three such notices within twelve months, the landlord select just three.
• Caveat: Each 72-hour notice must have been properly prepared. If one of them has been defectively prepared (e.g. wrong date, time, etc.) or incorrectly served (e.g. improper posting and mailing, etc.) it will not count towards the three strikes. For this reason, it is suggested that legal counsel closely review each 72-hour notice that is intended to become the basis of a 3-strikes eviction.

Thirty-Day Notices: Pursuant to ORS 90.630(1) - (7), a landlord may terminate a space rental agreement for a manufactured dwelling or floating home if a tenant:

• Violates a law or ordinance related to the tenant's conduct as a tenant, including but not limited to a material noncompliance with ORS 90.740 (Tenant Obligations);
• Violates a rule or rental agreement provision related to the tenant's conduct as a tenant and imposed as a condition of occupancy, including but not limited to a material noncompliance with a rental agreement regarding a program of recovery in drug and alcohol free housing;
• Is classified as a level three sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (3); Note that this violation is not curable, and the 30-day notice must so state; or
• Fails to pay a (i) Late charge pursuant to ORS 90.260; (ii) Fee pursuant to ORS 90.302; or (iii) Utility or service charge pursuant to ORS 90.534 or 90.536.
• Note that for violation regarding the physical condition of the home, a 30-day notice does not arise under ORS 90.630; rather ORS 90.632 applies. Do not get the two types of events confused. Use MHCO Form No. 55 is to be used for repair and deterioration issues under ORS 90.632, and Form No. 43 is to be used for all other curable 30 day notices arising under ORS 90.630.
• The 30-day notice must state facts sufficient to notify the tenant of the reasons for termination of the tenancy and state that the tenant may avoid termination by correcting the violation within the 30-day period.
• If substantially the same act or omission that constituted the prior violation recurs within six months after the date of the notice, the landlord may terminate the tenancy upon at least 20 days' written notice specifying the violation and the date of termination of the tenancy.
• Note that notwithstanding issuance of a 30-day notice, management may issue a notice for nonpayment of rent under ORS 90.394. Caution: If the last day of a 30-day notice of termination is on, say the 15th of the month, the landlord's 72-hour notice issued on the 8th day of that month should only demand rent up through the 15th. If the 72-hour notice demands rent covering the period after the 15th, it could invalidate the 30-day notice since it demands that the tenant pay rent for a period of time beyond the official end of the tenancy. There is also a risk of incorrectly calculating the number of days in the 72-hoour notice. For these reasons, I do not recommend issuance of a 72-hour notice while a 30-day notice is pending. And if the tenant voluntarily pays the rent while the notice is pending, I recommend immediately returning it, saying that the resident must first timely cure the default identified in the 30-day notice (assuming the default is curable).

[1] Or the fifth day of the rental period is a 144-day notice is used.

[2] I do not recommend waiting to issue the 30-day notice. It should be sent or delivered concurrently with the 3rd strike, i.e. the 3rd 72-hour notice.

Answer. I believe that what you want to do is possible; you want to verify with your own legal counsel.

But let me suggest that you asked the question in the wrong way. Rather than asking whether the law allows this, you should ask whether the law disallows it. In other words, in most cases, when it comes to landlord-tenant legal rights and duties, Chapter 90 sets a "floor" below which you cannot go.[1] So although the law does not address this specific issue, that does not mean you cannot do institute such a policy, so long as it does not violate other portions of the chapter.

What laws might apply? Here are the ones that come to mind:

90.130 Obligation of good faith. Every duty under this chapter and every act which must be performed as a condition precedent to the exercise of a right or remedy under this chapter imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement. [Formerly 91.730]

90.135 Unconscionability. (1) If the court, as a matter of law, finds:

(a) A rental agreement or any provision thereof was unconscionable when made, the court may refuse to enforce the agreement, enforce the remainder of the agreement without the unconscionable provision, or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid an unconscionable result; or

(b) A settlement in which a party waives or agrees to forgo a claim or right under this chapter or under a rental agreement was unconscionable when made, the court may refuse to enforce the settlement, enforce the remainder of the settlement without the unconscionable provision, or limit the application of any unconscionable provision to avoid an unconscionable result.

(2) If unconscionability is put into issue by a party or by the court upon its own motion the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to the setting, purpose and effect of the rental agreement or settlement to aid the court in making the determination. [Formerly 91.735]

90.220 Terms and conditions of rental agreement; smoking policy; rent obligation and payment. (1) A landlord and a tenant may include in a rental agreement terms and conditions not prohibited by this chapter or other rule of law including rent, term of the agreement and other provisions governing the rights and obligations of the parties. ****

90.262 Use and occupancy rules and regulations; adoption; enforceability; restrictions. (1) A landlord, from time to time, may adopt a rule or regulation, however described, concerning the tenant's use and occupancy of the premises. It is enforceable against the tenant only if:

(a) Its purpose is to promote the convenience, safety or welfare of the tenants in the premises, preserve the landlord's property from abusive use, or make a fair distribution of services and facilities held out for the tenants generally;

(b) It is reasonably related to the purpose for which it is adopted;

(c) It applies to all tenants in the premises in a fair manner;

(d) It is sufficiently explicit in its prohibition, direction or limitation of the tenant's conduct to fairly inform the tenant of what the tenant must or must not do to comply;

(e) It is not for the purpose of evading the obligations of the landlord; and

(f) The tenant has written notice of it at the time the tenant enters into the rental agreement, or when it is adopted.

(2) If a rule or regulation adopted after the tenant enters into the rental agreement works a substantial modification of the bargain, it is not valid unless the tenant consents to it in writing. ****

90.510 Statement of policy; rental agreement; rules and regulations; remedies. ***

(6) Every landlord who rents a space for a manufactured dwelling or floating home shall provide rules and regulations concerning the tenant's use and occupancy of the premises. A violation of the rules and regulations may be cause for termination of a rental agreement. However, this subsection does not create a presumption that all rules and regulations are identical for all tenants at all times. A rule or regulation shall be enforceable against the tenant only if:

(a) The rule or regulation:

(A) Promotes the convenience, safety or welfare of the tenants;

(B) Preserves the landlord's property from abusive use; or

(C) Makes a fair distribution of services and facilities held out for the general use of the tenants.

(b) The rule or regulation:

(A) Is reasonably related to the purpose for which it is adopted and is reasonably applied;

(B) Is sufficiently explicit in its prohibition, direction or limitation of the tenant's conduct to fairly inform the tenant of what the tenant shall do or may not do to comply; and

(C) Is not for the purpose of evading the obligations of the landlord. ****

Conclusion. Note that ORS 90.295 pertains to "applicant" screening charges, etc. The statute is very specific and detailed. However, that is because it is limited to situations where a prospective tenant is seeking entry into the park as a tenant. There is nothing in Chapter 90 dealing with background check for guests who will remain at the park in excess of 14 days. However, if I were to draft a rule to implement your suggested policy, I would likely use it as a general template of issues that should be addressed, since some of them are the same, e.g. denial of the right to remain at the premises because of a failure to pass the background check. Additionally, you would want to make the list of disqualifying criteria known in advance, so tenants and applicants knew whether it would be worth the cost and effort to apply.

Lastly, I suggest that you implement such a rule through a rule change in accordance with ORS 90.610. Good luck!

[1] For example, on nonpayment of rent notices, you would not want to institute a payment period shorter than 72 hours. Similarly, you would not shorten the cure time for a rules violation to less than 30 days. Conversely, if you wanted to lengthen the time to pay late rent or cure a violation, you can certainly do so.

Answer: First, remember that if the resident who is occupying the home is NOT the owner of the home, the manufactured housing section of the Oregon landlord-tenant law (ORS 90.505 et seq.) does NOT apply. This means that the applicable law is that which applies to tenants in apartments and single family homes. This portion of the landlord tenant law is more landlord-favorable - at least in terms of timing. MHCO is currently in the process of developing a form for abandoned personal property, other than manufactured homes located inside of parks.

In this case, ORS 90.425 applies. Although this is the abandonment law, it is limited to such things as personal property, motor vehicles, RVs, and manufactured homes not located in a park. If you have ever done an abandonment of a home in your community, ORS 90.675 applies. Although the protocols are much the same, there are some material differences. Here is a summary of the law addressing your question:

1. Automobiles.
   1. You must determine if there are any lienholders;
   2. You must also determine if the owner of the vehicle is different that the deceased resident;
   3. You must send a written abandonment letter[1]:
      1. By first class mail to the deceased tenant at the premises[2];
      2. Personally deliver or send it by first class mail to any heir, devisee, personal representative or designated person, if actually known to the landlord; and
      3. Sent it by first class mail to the attention of an estate administrator of the Department of State Lands.
   4. The letter must give the heir, devisee, or personal representative of designated person, not less than 45 days to notify the landlord of their intent to claim the vehicle(s), and allow them not more than 15 days (or such longer period as agreed to by the parties) to actually pick it/them up.
   5. If the recipient does not pick up the vehicle(s), the landlord may sell it/them at a public or private sale, or if the reasonable current fair market value is $1,000 or less or so low that the cost of storage and conducting a public sale probably exceeds the amount that would be realized from the sale, may sell certain items and destroy or otherwise dispose of the remaining personal property.
   6. The vehicle(s) may be stored at the space, or stored at a commercial storage company, or other place of safekeeping;
   7. NOTE: This is an abbreviated version of the process, and should not undertaken without expert assistance.
2. All Other Personal Property
   1. The written notice of abandonment must be sent to the same persons as for the vehicle(s);
   2. The heir, devisee, or personal representative of designated person must be given not less than five (5) days if the notice is personally delivered, or eight (8) days if mailed, to notify the landlord if they intend to pick up the personal property, and not more than fifteen (15) days (or such longer period as agreed to by the parties) to actually pick it up.
   3. If the personal property is not picked up, the same protocol applies as fore vehicle(s);
   4. The personal property may be stored at the space, or stored at a commercial storage company or other place of safekeeping[3];

A word of caution: Until the letter is sent, both of the abandonment statutes, ORS 90.425 and ORS 90.675, are not clear about the landlord's legal responsibility for "safekeeping" of a resident's abandoned property. However, there is no question that the landlord does have that responsibility once the abandonment has been declared by issuance of the letter.

This means that you can secure the personal property, either by removing it from the home, or, in this case, with the owner's consent, secure it in the home, and prohibiting access. The reason I bring this up is because you mentioned that the foster brothers gained access to the home and apparently removed what they wanted.

Yet, ORS 90.425(21) provides:

(d) The landlord shall allow a person that is an heir, devisee or personal representative of the tenant, or an estate administrator of the department, to remove the personal property if the person contacts the landlord within the period provided by [ORS 90.425(25)], complies with the requirements of this section and provides the landlord with reasonable evidence that the person is an heir, devisee or personal representative, or an estate administrator of the department. (Emphasis added.)

(e) If neither an heir, devisee nor personal representative of the tenant, nor an estate administrator of the department, contacts the landlord *** the landlord shall allow removal of the personal property by the designated person of the tenant, if the designated person contacts the landlord within that period and complies with the requirements of this section and provides the landlord with reasonable evidence that the person is the designated person.

(f) A landlord who allows removal of personal property under this subsection is not liable to another person that has a claim or interest in the personal property. (Emphasis added.)

Subsection (f) is as important for what it doesn'tsay, as what it does, i.e. the landlord's failure to follow the statute could result in liability, e.g. to the heirs, etc., whose property was released to persons not so entitled.

So the take-away here is this: In the case of residents living alone, park records should be updated to determine (a) if there is a will; and (b) who should be notified in the event of death or disability.

And lastly, rather than allowing various persons entry into the home of a deceased resident, it is more prudent to immediately send out an abandonment letter, which gives you automatic power to "secure" the decedent's personal property, until the proper persons can be identified to remove it.

If the resident owned the home, you would have proceeded under ORS 90.675 (for abandoned homes in a park), which is much the same as ORS 90.425 (for personal property only), except that in the case of abandoned homes in parks, the 45-day letter gives the estate 30 days to remove the home or enter into a storage agreement, for its resale; and since the home is subject to a personal property tax, the tax assessor and/or collector would have to be notified with the 45-day letter.

[1] The information contained in this letter is much the same as that when a manufactured home is abandoned in a park. See, ORS 90.425(5).

[2] The notice must refer to the heir, devisee, personal representative, designated person or estate administrator of the department, instead of the deceased resident.

[3] If the deceased resident owned the home, the personal property could be stored there, as well.

Answer A: First, the MHCO Lease cited above addresses this. Not fixing the leaks, which are their responsibility to do, is a violation. Secondly, ORS 90.740(f) requires that tenants “(u)se electrical, water, storm water drainage and sewage disposal systems in a reasonable manner and maintain the connections to those systems. The tenant is using the water system in an unreasonable manner when they refuse to fix the leaks.

ORS 90.630 (Termination by Landlord) provides, in relevant part, the following:

 (1) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, the landlord may terminate a rental agreement that is a month-to-month or fixed term tenancy for space for a manufactured dwelling or floating home by giving to the tenant not less than 30 days’ notice in writing before the date designated in the notice for termination if the tenant:

      (a) Violates a law or ordinance related to the tenant’s conduct as a tenant, including but not limited to a material noncompliance with ORS 90.740;

      (b) Violates a rule or rental agreement provision related to the tenant’s conduct as a tenant and imposed as a condition of occupancy, including but not limited to a material noncompliance with a rental agreement regarding a program of recovery in drug and alcohol free housing….

ORS 90.630 goes on to explain that you may issue a 30-day written notice of termination, allowing the tenant to fix the leaks within 30 days and avoid termination. If they fail to do so, you may file for eviction. If they cure, but the problem occurs again within six months following the date of your earlier 30-day notice, you may terminate the tenancy within 20 days, and there is no opportunity to cure. MHCO has the necessary forms.

Be sure you have papered your file to support your contention that these are water leaks for which the tenant is responsible, and then specifically describe the violations (there are two of them, one under the Lease, and the other under the statute)  in the Notice. 

Answer B:  This question is same as the prior one and the answer is the same (although the placement of the requirement may not be in the same location, depending on the date of your lease or rental agreement). Just make sure you have the evidence (e.g. plumber statement) before acting, and that you adequately identify the problem and solution in the Notice. 

Answer: Since you said that the rent is paid every month, I assume that your resident is a month-to-month tenant (as opposed to weekly or fixed-term). If the tenant is within the first year of occupancy in the park, you can evict with a 30-day, no-cause eviction notice (MHCO Form 43 C).

(Caveat: Portland and Milwaukie both have ordinances requiring 90-day no-cause notices to allmonthly tenants, regardless of how long they have been tenants. In addition, Portland requires landlords to make "relocation assistance" payments to tenants evicted for no-cause, ranging from $2,900 to $4,500 - although the applicability of this requirement to RV tenants is legally questionable. Consult an attorney if you rent RV spaces in either of these cities.)

Unfortunately, due to recently enacted Senate Bill 608, you no longer have the right to evict a month-to-month tenant for no-cause afterthe first year of occupancy except in very limited circumstances that do not likely apply in your case (i.e., the RV park is being closed and converted to a nonresidential use). Instead, Senate Bill 608 now forces landlords to primarily rely on for-cause evictions after the first year of the tenancy.

In your particular case, you should issue a 72-hour rent nonpayment notice each and every month that the tenant is late with the rent (MHCO Form 82). If rent is due on the first day of the month, you can issue a 72-hour notice as soon as the eighth day of the month. At some point, you may catch the tenant missing the payment deadline in the 72-hour notice, after which you can file an eviction action in court.

If allowed by the tenant's rental agreement, you should also assess a late fee every month. If the tenant fails to pay the late fee as required by the rental agreement, you should issue a 30/14-day, for-cause notice to the tenant requiring payment of the late fee. Under ORS 90.392 (4), if the tenant does not pay the late fee within 14 days after delivery of the notice, the tenancy terminates 30 days after the notice was delivered.

You are correct that the "three strikes" law does not apply to an RV tenant. Only manufactured home tenants can be evicted with a 30-day notice after receiving three or more 72-hour notices within a 12-month period. As such, RV park landlords must rely on the strategies outlined above to evict month-to-month tenants on late rent payments.

One final strategy for the future is to consider using a fixed-term rental agreement. Senate Bill 608 does allow a landlord to evict a tenant at the end of the fixed term with a 90-day notice if the tenant has committed three or more violations of the rental agreement within the preceding 12 months. You must give a written warning for each violation that specifies the violation, states that three or more violations within a 12-month period may result in termination of the tenancy at the end of the fixed-term, and states that correcting the third or subsequent violation is not a defense to the termination. While this would not help in your current situation, it could be used with future tenants if you choose this strategy of using fixed-term leases.

As usual, you should always seek the advice of a knowledgeable attorney if you are unsure whether to issue an eviction notice to an RV tenant, have questions on what kind of eviction notice to issue, or need guidance to use fixed-term agreements for future residents.

The Tenant Relocation Assistance amounts are as follows:  $2,900 for a studio or Single Room Occupancy Dwelling Unit; $3,300 for a one-bedroom Dwelling Unit; $4,200 for a two-bedroom Dwelling Unit; and $4,500 for a three-bedroom or larger Dwelling Unit.  

Previously, a rent increase of 10% or more, as measured over a rolling 12-month period, gave option a tenant the ability to request Relocation Assistance from their landlord.  Now, all rent increases are frozen for nonexempt tenancies between September 16, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Two major exemptions: (a) Renter shares the dwelling unit with the landlord or (b) The tenancy is week-to-week. For a complete list go to: Administrative Rules.

Rent Increase Notices Issued After September 16. If the landlord issued the rent increase notice after September 16, and represents in good faith that they were not aware of the new ordinance, he or she may provide written notice to the tenant that rescindsthe rent increase. Doing so relieves the landlord of the potential relocation assistance obligation. However, the tenant must receive the rescission notice from the landlord within 30 calendar days from the delivery of the original rent increase notice.

Rent Increase Notices Issued Before September 16. If the landlord has already given notice of a rent increase that becomes effective between September 16, 2020 and March 31, 2021, thus triggering the potential Relocation Assistance payment, the tenant has 45 calendar days after receiving the rent increase notice or until September 30, 2020, whichever is longer, to provide written request for Relocation Assistance to the landlord. 

However, the landlord may provide written notice to the tenant that rescinds the rent increase notice and refunds any increased rent paid by the tenant, thus relieving the landlord of the potential obligation.  The tenant must receive the landlord’s notice and refund of increased rents paid no later than 30 calendar days after receiving the tenant’s written notice requesting Relocation Assistance. 

Portland City Limits.The Relocation Assistance rules only apply to “residential rental units” within Portland city limits, which can be managed by an owner, a sublessor, or property management company. They can be either month-to-month rental agreements or fixed-term tenancies (i.e. leases). 

Does This Apply To Manufactured Housing Communities? In my opinion “No”, but others may disagree, and should secure their own opinion. I say this because although PCC 30.01.085does refer to “Dwelling Units” as defined in the Oregon Landlord Tenant Act[1](and that law says that if it is in a manufactured housing community, they are referring to the space and not the structure). But how can relocation assistance be categorized for a community space as being one-bedroom, two-bedroom or three-bedroom, or larger?  If manufactured housing spaces were ever intended to be included in this ordinance, the drafters would have had to include the structure in order to determine the amount of the relocation assistance. They did not do so. 

Secondly, for some reason PCC 30.01.085lists several exemptions to the relocation assistance rules, but notes that: “For purposes of the exemptions provided in this Subsection, “Dwelling Unit” is defined by PCC 33.910, and not by ORS 90.100.” But Portland City Code 33.910 defines a “Dwelling Unit” based upon “Residential Structure Types” such as Accessory Dwelling Units, Duplexes, or a “dwelling unit located on its own lot”. It also defines a “Dwelling Unit” as a “building or portion of a building….”  

So, once again, manufactured housing appears to be the inadvertent beneficiary of drafting oversight, which in this case, is a good thing. 

Caveat: The above is not to be relied upon as legal advice. Readers are encouraged to secure their own legal opinion.

As was reported by Chuck Carpenter during the Legislative session, the goal from MHCO’s perspective, was to use the coalition to get the best possible result considering the political landscape in the Legislature. Bluntly, some of the original ideas proposed by the tenants in the coalition were quite onerous. The end result, however, is a true compromise that is favorable to MHCO landlords, all things considered.

If you would like to learn more about these issues and/or you have particular questions, please join me for my presentation at the 2019 Annual Conference in October. In the meantime here are 16 questions and answers that will get you started.

1. What does mediation mean? Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution process that is different from going to court and having a judge (or jury) pick a winner and loser by determining the facts and applying the law to the facts. Mediation is also different from arbitration. At an arbitration, the parties typically pick a person (usually an attorney) to act like a judge and determine the facts and apply law. At an arbitration there is also a winner and a loser. 

In mediation, the parties typically pick a third party neutral who will meet with the parties to help them find a solution to resolve a dispute. Because mediation requires the agreement of the parties to come to a resolution, it is not always successful. Mediation does not limit a party’s ability to file a lawsuit or arbitration.

In my experience, the cases that resolve at mediation are where bothparties come with an open mind, are willing to listen and can consider compromise in order to avoid the cost and hassle of litigation. 

In my experience, the cases that don’t resolve are usually because one of the parties has unrealistic expectations or opinion of their case, or that the matter should move forward based on “principle.” 

2.   When is mediation required? Mediation is required for any non-exempt issues (see question 3) involving compliance with the rental agreement or non-exempt conduct of a landlord or a tenant within the facility. Please note that a facility is a manufactured home park or a floating home marina. Mediation can be initiated regarding a non-exempt dispute between a landlord and a tenant or between two or more tenants. Note that if the dispute is between two or more tenants, mediation must be initiated by the landlord. 

3.   What types of disputes are exempt (i.e. not subject to mediation)? The following disputes are not subject to mediation:

(a) Facility closures consistent with ORS 90.645 or 90.671; 

(b) Facility sales consistent with ORS 90.842 to 90.850; 

(c) Rent payments or amounts owed, including increases in rent consistent with ORS 90.600;

(d) Termination of tenancy pursuant to ORS 90.394 (failure to pay rent), 90.396 (24 hour notices), or 90.630(8) (three strike provision); 

(e) A dispute brought by a tenant who is alleged to be a perpetrator of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking under ORS 90.445 when the dispute involves either the allegation or the victim of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking; 

(g) A dispute involving a person not authorized to possess a dwelling unit as described in ORS 90.403; or 

(h) A dispute raised by the landlord or tenant after the tenancy has terminated and possession has been returned to the landlord (including ORS 90.675 (abandonments). 

4.   How is mediation initiated? Mediation maybe initiated by a tenant or a landlord. If a tenant or landlord initiates the mediation process, then the parties are required to participate (but see questions 7 and 8 below). If there is a dispute between or among tenants, a landlord mustinitiate mediation.  

5.   What if mediation is not currently included in my rental agreement? A landlord and/or tenant is required to mediate regardless of whether a rental agreement currently provides for mediation. If a rental agreement does not currently have such a process, SB 586 requires a landlord to unilaterally amend the rental agreement to include mediation. Specifically, ORS 90.510 (5) (what is required to be included in rental agreements) is amended to include in a rental agreement a section for mandatory mediation of disputes that states: “that the tenant or the landlord may request mandatory mediation of a dispute that may arise concerning the rental agreement or the application of this chapter, and the process by which a party may request mediation, including a link to the web site for the Manufactured and Marina Communities Resource Center with additional information about mandatory mediation of disputes.”

 6.  Who facilitates a mediation? Mediation may be requested through either: (1) Manufactured and Marina Communities Resource Center (“MMCRC”); or (2) a local Community Dispute Resolution Center (“CDRC”); or (3) a mutually agreed-upon and qualified mediator. Each party must cooperate with the CDRC or designated mediator in scheduling a mediation session at a mutually agreeable day and time, within 30 days of the initiation of mediation. Each party must attend at least one mediation session. 

7.   Who has to participate in the mediation (i.e. does it have to be the owner)?  A landlord can designate a representative to participate in the mediation on the Landlord’s behalf (including a non attorney). The representative, however, must have the authority to resolve the dispute in the mediation.  Note that a tenant can also designate a representative.

8.   Do I have to reach an agreement in the mediation?  No.Neither party is required to reach an agreement in a mediation. Each party must attempt to mediate the dispute in “good faith.”  The law specifically says that the parties are not required to: (1) reach an agreement on all or any issues in the mediation; (2) participate in more than one mediation session; (3) participate for an unreasonable length of time in a mediation session; or (4) participate if the other party is using the mediation to harass the party or is otherwise abusing the duty to meditate.

9.   What would happen if a party failed to meditate in good faith? If a party fails to meditate in good faith by abusing the right to require mediation or uses mediation to harass the other party, the aggrieved party may recover an amount equal to one month’s rent from the violating party. Please note that this is a two way street. In addition, the other party has a defense to any claim brought by the violating party over the dispute involved in the mediation request, and may have the claim dismissed.

10.Can I use an admission in mediation at a subsequent trial? Conversely, can something I say be used against me? No. Mediation, and what is said during mediation, is confidential. Any statement made in a mediation is inadmissible. The purpose is to have an honest dialogue in order to encourage a settlement. Additionally, a mediator cannot be called as a witness.

11.Can a tenant request a mediation after I send them a termination of tenancy notice?

Mediation can be requested after a notice terminating tenancy has been sent to a tenant, but only if the request is made to MMCRC or a designated mediator and a written confirmation of that request is delivered to you (the landlord) beforethe landlord files an action for possession under ORS 105.110. If the tenant delivers a notice requesting mediation before a landlord files an eviction action, the landlord may not file such action until after the mediation process concludes. If a landlord delivers a notice requesting mediation before a tenant files an action regarding a dispute, the tenant may not file such action until after the mediation process ends. 

12. Can I still accept rent during the mediation process?  Yes. Notwithstanding ORS 90.412, acceptance of rent or performance by a landlord after either party requests mediation and during the mediation process does not constitute waiver of the landlord’s right to terminate a tenancy following the mediation. Acceptance of rent or performance after the mediation process ends may constitute waiver. Additionally, all statutes of limitations are suspended during the mediation process. 

13.What happens after the mediation? If a mediation is successful, the parties should come to an agreement that resolves the dispute. The question is how enforceable is the agreement. Enforceability will depend upon the issues involved, the terms and how the agreement is drafted. I would encourage you to discuss with your legal counsel strategies on how to make the most of a mediation.For example, if an eviction action has already commenced, you may want to attempt to make the agreement a part of the ORS 105.148 mediation/agreement process. Another example is setting up an enforcement mechanism within the agreement itself.  

The CDRC or the designated mediator shall notify MMCRC of the successful or unsuccessful outcome of the mediation. The parties and the CDRC or mediator are not required to give a copy of any mediation agreement to MMCRC.

If a mediation is not successful, the parties may continue on the path they were on before the mediation. 

14.This sounds expensive, who is paying for it?Mediations will be performed by the existing network of CDRC mediators, funded by the existing annual assessment already paid by tenants ($10, collected with property tax assessments).  If the parties choose a private mediator, then the parties will have to determine how that mediator is paid. Additionally, the current annual fee paid by park landlords ($25 for parks of 20 spaces or fewer, $50 for larger parks) is doubled.

15. Very interesting (as always), Bill, but what’s this about $100,000 annual grant to the Oregon Law Center?As you may be aware, some states have allocated substantial funding to their state’s Justice Department or to create a team of private attorneys general to assist with enforcement of tenant rights. Similar systems were originally proposed by the tenants during coalition meetings and were strongly opposed by the landlord group. The ultimate compromise was a limited $100,000 per year grant to be given to the Oregon Law Centerto employ oneattorney to provide direct legal services to statewide park and marina residents on matters arising under the Oregon Residential Landlord Tenant Act.

16.Is mandatory mediation and the $100,000 per year in perpetuity? No. Both elements have a four-year sunset. An advisory committee has been created to monitor both elements, consisting of equal numbers of landlord and tenant representatives to present a report on the status of both elements to the 2021 and 2023 Legislatures to determine whether they should be renewed.

17. When does all of this go into effect? The effective date of SB 586 is January 1, 2010.