Search

Statement of Policy - Complying with the Truth in Renting Act

As of July 1, 1992, all manufactured home communities renting space for manufactured dwellings have been required to provide prospective and existing tenants with a Statement of Policy. The applicants must receive their Statement of Policy before signing the rental agreement. Existing tenants who have not previously received a copy of the Statement of Policy and are on month-to-month rental agreements must receive their copy at the time the next 90-day rent increases notice is issued (ORS 90.510(3)(b). All other existing tenants shall receive a copy of the statement of policy upon expiration of their current rental agreement and before signing a new agreement.

While a Statement of Policy is not technically a contract, it is an important document. A tenant or rental applicant who makes their decisions or changes their position in reliance upon the policies set forth in the statement may be entitled to hold the landlord to those written policies. As proof of delivery of the Statement of Policy to tenants or applicants, it is advised to get a signed receipt.

A landlord who intentionally and deliberately fails to provide a Statement of Policy as required by ORS 90.510, or delivers a legally defective one, may be subject to a lawsuit.

The Statement of Policy is required to include the following information in summary form:

  1. The location and approximate size of the space to be rented.
  2. The federal fair housing age classification and present zoning that affect the use of the rented space.
  3. The facility policy regarding rent adjustment and a rent history for the space to be rented. The rent history must, at a minimum, show the rent amounts on January 1 of each of the five preceding calendar years or during the length of the landlord's ownership, leasing or subleasing of the facility, whichever period is shorter.
  4. All personal property, services and facilities to be provided by the landlord.
  5. All installation charges imposed by the landlord and installation fees imposed by government agencies.
  6. The facility policy regarding rental agreement termination including but not limited to closure of the facility.
  7. The facility policy regarding facility sale.
  8. The facility policy regarding informal dispute resolution.
  9. Utilities and services available, the person furnishing them and the person responsible for payment.
  10. If a tenants' association exists for the facility, a one-page summary about the tenants' association that shall be provided to the landlord by the tenants' association and shall be attached to the statement of policy.
  11. Any facility policy regarding the removal of a manufactured dwelling, including a statement that removal may impact the market value of a dwelling. 

Mark Busch: Portland Doubles Down Against Landlords

The City of Portland upped its economic attack on the city's landlords last week by passing a tenant relocation assistance" ordinance. The ordinance requires landlords in the City of Portland to pay relocation expenses to tenants evicted for no-cause

Avoiding Common Mistakes That Have a Big Effect On a Mobile Home Park's Cash Flow

Joanne Stevens

Mistake #1: Rent increases

A lot of times owners act as if below market rent is the same as earning a merit badge. It isn’t. Having under market rent loses you money every month. If the property ever goes on the market, it will sell for less and maybe a lot less. Today a tenant isn’t going to move because the rent goes up to market. Most tenants know what the rents are at other mobile home parks (often having better market rent intel than the owner). They won’t be surprised when the rent goes up to market. If the owner is doing a good job of operating the mobile home park, higher rent won’t be cause to move. When doing a rent increase, include the rent survey for your market, showing the rent charged at other communities. Also, be sure to factor in the water, sewer and garbage, if included in the lot rent. The water and sewer are probably $30–$60 per month per house- hold, depending on the city, and the garbage is probably $9–$15 per month per occupied site. If you are paying for these, consider how you may pass these utilities through. Be sure to factor in an estimate of water, sewer and garbage for the owners that pay it or the tenants.

Mistake #2: Rent Survey

What should the rent be? Not that many owners do annual rent surveys. If you have a manager, that should be their job. If there are owners of multiple mobile home parks in your market, look to their rents as a benchmark of the real rent. After all, these companies have to report earnings to shareholders or investors. They can’t succeed by charging above market rents.

Mistake #3: Holding On Too Long

When you have a park owned home that isn’t selling, it’s time to let go, and get it sold or rented. Anyone that has been in this industry for a while and sells homes knows what it feels like to have an unsold mobile home that sits month after month with no offers. You market it, keep utilities on, pay insurance and cleaning, the staff shows it countless times and nothing. It’s time to cut the price (ouch!) or do whatever needs to be done to sell the home. Each month that passes is another month of rent you’ll never recover.

The same thing is true for mobile home park ownership. Sometimes the mobile home park property looks great on paper. After you actually own it, you find it’s not your cup of tea. Maybe it’s too far away from your office, the demand for homes isn’t good, or a major employer shuts down, to name a few reasons why investors sell a mobile home park. In Warren Buffet’s 2014 Letter To Investors, he freely writes about big mistakes he made early on with Berkshire Hathaway; mistakes that might have been deadly for the company. In fact, the Berkshire company (a textile company) which became the Berkshire of Berkshire Hathaway, closed 18 years after Mr. Buffet acquired it, and he writes, “During all of those 18 years, we struggled unremittingly, all to no avail. But stubbornness —stupidity—has its limits....I finally threw in the towel and closed the operation.” Mr. Buffet goes on to say that he knew the Berkshire company acquisition “... was a mistake. Having committed much of (the company’s) resources...I quickly compounded the error by continuing to invest in a business that eventually became the most costly of my career.” If the Sage of Omaha can admit to millions of followers that he blundered, then perhaps business owners and investors should take a page out of Mr. Buffet’s playbook and cut the cord when something isn’t working, be it a park owned home OR a park.

Mistake #4: Financing

There is a lot of refinancing and new loan action today. Why? The low interest rates plus the threat of rising interest rates are the reasons. The Federal Reserve has been making noise for what seems like years, about increasing the interest rates. As the economy improves and the jobless recovery continues to dissipate, the

Federal Reserve finally raised interest rates in late December of 2015. Not all lenders are the same though, and finding a lender, whether it be local, regional or national will make a big difference in both the amount financed (dollars to you!) and the ease of the transaction.

Mistake #5: Records

Today there is truly user friendly and effective software for mobile home parks. I use Rent Manager and so do a lot of other mobile home park owners. For your own peace of mind do yourself, your accountant, your manager and a buyer a big favor, and invest in good software (it’s not that much money). A couple of years ago, I hired a property manager with no accounting background. She took to Rent Manager like a duck to water. My accountant is also a big fan. Don’t be intimidated by upping your game with great software.

 

Mistake #6: Survey, Phase I and Appraisal

Once upon a time, when you acquired your property, you might have had the property surveyed, appraised and a Phase I (California) environmental assessment done. If you didn’t order these reports, whoever you bought from may have left them in the office or the survey may have been recorded. Try checking with the county recorder or county engineer. These re- ports will save you money and time if you ever need to update them, or your heirs or a buyer require them. It’s faster and cheaper, for example, if the land surveyor has an existing survey to start with.

Mistake #7: Water and Sewer

Please do something about this, both for your cash flow and the environment. These pesky leaks can be tough to find. Some of the large owners use American Leak Detection (Google it —they have regional offices). They are not cheap, but they will find your leaks and fix them. Water leaks are expensive; it is money you won’t ever recover. One time I sold a mobile home park where the owner knew he had a water leak to the tune of about an extra $2,000 per month. This was a small mobile home park. When he sold the park, a condition of the sale was to find the water leak(s) and fix them. By then, he really wanted to sell his park because his company (not the mobile home park business) was growing and the business re- quired his full attention. The upshot was that after losing at least $40,000 in water costs he hired two companies (the first company didn’t find it) about $3,000 to find the leak and another couple of thousand for the second company to fix the leak. The moral of the story is that you will never get back the wasted water bills, so it’s best to bite the bullet and find and fix the leaks.

Joanne Stevens is a real estate broker specialist in listing and selling mobile home parks and manufactured home communities throughout the U.S.

She can be reached at 319.378.6785 phone; 319.365.9833 fax; and email: joannestevens@ joannemstevens.com

This article was recently published in WMA's February 2016 "Reporter".  MHCO would like to express our deep appreciation to WMA for allowing MHCO to upload this article to MHCO.ORG.

Legal Case #3: Duty to Make Reasonable Accommodations Doesn’t Require New Service Offerings

MHCO

The basic rule is that landlords must make reasonable accommodations to the point of undue hardship. Most resonable accommodations cases were decided on the basis of reasonableness, including an Arizona case posing the question of whether it’s reasonable to expect a landlord to introduce a whole new service or activity for a tenant with disabilities.

Situation: A fair housing organization sues an assisted housing facility that offers elderly residents limited housekeeping and communal dining but no medical services and denying two accommodations to a deaf rental prospect:

  • Providing him with an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter; and
  • Installing a strobe doorbell outside his unit.  

You Make the Call: Which, if either refusal, violates the facility’s duty to make reasonable accommodations?

Answer: Only the refusal to provide the doorbell violates the facility’s duty to make reasonable accommodations.

Ruling: The Arizona federal court renders a split decision. It grants the facility summary judgment on the ASL interpreter claim but okays trial on the doorbell claim [Southwest Fair Housing Council v. WG Chandler Villas SH LLC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53677, 2021 WL 1087200].

Takeaway: Accommodations aren’t reasonable if they require landlords to provide fundamental changes to their services or assume undue financial burdens. The request for an interpreter is unreasonable because it requires the facility to establish a new service it didn’t offer any of its tenants. But the doorbell was relatively cheap to install and required no changes to the facility’s service offerings.

 

End of Summer Legislative Update

The Manufactured Housing Landlord - Tenant Coalition (negotiations) convened again the end of last month (August 2014) to further discuss a number of issues that may potentially be adopted into legislation in 2015.  Here is a summary of the latest developments on several key issues.

 

The $6 Assessment.  The coalition spent a considerable amount of time discussing the $6.00 assessment that community residents pay to finance Oregon Housing & Community Services Manufactured Communities Resource Center.  Oregon counties are increasingly not collecting property taxes on homes in communities and hence the $6 assessment is not being collected.  Both the residents and the agency are concerned about continued funding.  MHCO is concerned that community owners will be given the responsibility of collecting the assessment from the residents and handing it over to the government.  MHCO is adamantly opposed to landlord's becoming tax/assessment collectors.

 

The tax assessor association floated the idea of the residents paying more - sort of a surcharge on the assessment in order to cover the cost of the counties in collecting the assessment.  No decision was made on this issue - we will see what the next meeting brings.

 

Abandoned Manufactured Homes and Unpaid Taxes.  The coalition continued to discuss ORS 90.675.  Currently, Oregon law causes a landlord to throw or give away a manufactured home worth more than $8,000 if the back taxes exceed the value of the home. The back taxes owed on some abandoned MHs may be significant, even exceeding the value of the manufactured home. In these cases, the financial incentive for the landlord, assuming there is no purchaser at the required abandoned property sale, is to destroy or give away the manufactured home. This creates a vacant space in the park.

 

MHCO would like to see all taxes on an abandoned manufactured home waived.  The tax assessor association proposed waiving the first $8,000 of taxes owed to be waived if the landlord buys the home.  At this time the MHCO is considering options to raise that amount or to completely waive the taxes owed.  Again, no final decision has been made and negotiations continue.

 

Cure Period for Discrete vs. Ongoing Violations.  As we have mentioned in earlier legislative updates, MHCO would like to see the 30-day cure" (ORS 90.630) period reviewed with some changes.  Allowing a resident to continue disruptive behavior for 29 days and then correct the behavior just before the 30 day "cure" period ends does not seem fair to the other residents in the community and management.  We continue to discuss options.  MHCO has proposed  that anything that impacts the resident's "peaceful enjoyment" should require a shorter "cure" period.  Again - no final decision was made and we will continue to discuss this at the next coalition meeting.

 

Manufactured Home Sales - Conflict Community Owner Sales vs. Resident Sales.  The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) has been investigating conflicts between community owner sales of homes and resident sales.  DCBS has met with the coalition on several occasions but no specific proposal has been put on the table.  This is the issue that MHCO is most concerned about as we head into the 2015 Legislative session.  There will be a more in depth discussion on this issue at the next meeting.  MHCO will keep you posted as this issue develops.

 

Fixes to Resident Purchase.   There are several issues that have been discovered regarding the resident purchase program (HB 4038) that was passed in the 2014 February session.  Below is a brief summary of the issue and the proposed solutions. 

 

A. The loophole is in favor of tenants

Resident Guest Is A Sex Offender - Leaves and Now Returns - How to Evict

Question - A tenant's son has a conviction for sex abuse and is still on parole. He was living with his father in the community until neighbors found out about his conviction and began complaining about his presence because this is a family park with many children. We informed the son's father that he would have to leave due to his conviction. He did leave but now he is doing odd jobs here in the park. He also comes into the park to visit his family. We are getting resident complaints because people are still concerned for their children. Is there anything I can do as a manager to keep this man out of our community? Answer: Your question raises several issues worthy of discussion. First, the fact that the son is in the park and you didn't know he was a convicted sex offender, tells me that the park should beef up its rules to require all persons 18 years and over undergo a criminal background check. If the son is on parole, you may want to try to contact his parole officer. I fully suspect that there may be conditions of his parole that may apply to keep him out of the park. At the risk of sounding harsh, it is a fact that sexual predators" are not a protected class under the state and federal constitutions. In short

Lesson #7: Fair Housing Laws Protect Victims of Domestic Violence

MHCO

 

The disparate impact rule also opens the door for groups that the FHA doesn’t list as protected classes to sue for housing discrimination, as illustrated by an important case from Pennsylvania.

Situation: A domestic violence victim tells her landlord that she’s being stalked by her ex-boyfriend and needs to move out. When the landlord refuses to let her out of the lease, she sues for discrimination and failure to accommodate. The landlord asks the court to dismiss the case because domestic violence victims aren’t a protected class under the FHA.

    You Make the Call: Does the tenant have a legally valid claim for FHA discrimination?

    Answer: Yes

    Ruling: The Pennsylvania federal court rejects summary judgment for the landlord and allows the case to go to trial, citing well-established case law finding that the FHA does protect victims of domestic violence given its disproportionate impact on women and minorities [Butler v. Sundo Capital, LLC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171736, 2021 WL 4134034].

    Takeaway: There are three important morals to take from the Butler case:

    1. Domestic violence victims can sue for housing discrimination under the FHA (as well as many state laws, including Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, New Jersey, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin);
    2. Zero-tolerance policies that lump victims and purveyors of domestic violence together for adverse treatment is a form of discrimination the law prohibits; and
    3. Protection for domestic violence victims may include allowing them out of their lease early without penalty if they must move out to avoid threatened violence. 

    Fair Housing ‘Dos & Don'ts’ for Dealing with Residents Who Break the Rules

    MHCO

    First in a series of articles dealing fair housing issues when addressing residents who break the rules. 

    Fair housing problems can arise when dealing with residents who break the rules. The specifics will vary, but all residents have to abide by some basic rules: They must pay rent, avoid damage to the unit (subject to reasonable wear and tear), and refrain from interfering with the quiet enjoyment of other residents.

    But what happens when residents break the rules? They may fail to pay their rent, ignore community policies, damage the property, or disturb their neighbors. Whatever the problem, you have the right to enforce the lease and community rules, subject to applicable landlord/tenant laws. It doesn’t have to be a fair housing problem, but it can quickly become one if you’re not careful.

    Over the next couple weeks we will cover eight rules —the essential ‘dos and don’ts’—for dealing with residents who break the rules and keep the housing provider from violating fair housing laws.

    WHAT DOES THE LAW SAY?

    The federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) prohibits discrimination in housing because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, and disability. Fair housing law bans communities from denying housing to anyone—or discriminating against them in the terms, conditions, or privileges of residency—based on any of these protected characteristics.

    The law doesn’t stop you from holding residents accountable for their own bad behavior, but they may accuse you of discrimination when taken to task for breaking the rules. They may claim that you’re falsely accusing them of breaking the rules—or treating them more harshly than other residents for similar infractions—because they’re members of a protected class.

    Sometimes the rules themselves come under attack. Communities may enforce rules to ensure safety, prevent property damage, and protect the quiet enjoyment of the property by other residents, but it’s unlawful to do so in a way that unreasonably interferes with the right of families with children to use and enjoy the community’s common areas and amenities.

    Moreover, fair housing law may exempt some residents from following the rules under certain circumstances. As part of the law’s ban on disability discrimination, it’s unlawful to refuse to make reasonable accommodations to rules, policies, practices, or services to enable an individual with a disability to fully enjoy use of the property. Because a community’s policies may have a different effect on people with disabilities than on others, HUD says that treating residents with disabilities exactly the same as others will sometimes deny them an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the premises. So you may be required to make exceptions to your rules—such as no-pet policies or parking restrictions—as a reasonable accommodation for a resident with a disability.

    Fair housing law doesn’t require communities to approve all accommodation requests. For example, a request for a reasonable accommodation may be denied if providing the accommodation is not reasonable—that is, if it would impose an undue financial and administrative burden on the community or result in a fundamental alteration of its operations. In such cases, federal guidelines say that communities should engage in an “interactive process” with the person making the request to discuss whether there’s an alternative accommodation that would effectively address his disability-related needs.

    8 DOS & DON’TS FOR DEALING WITH RESIDENTS WHO BREAK THE RULES

    RULE #1: 

    DO Hold Residents Accountable for Rules Violations 

    DON’T Be Afraid to Take Action When Necessary

    You may expect all residents to abide by the lease and community rules, and you may take action against anyone who fails to do so. Fair housing law bans discrimination against members of protected classes, but it doesn’t excuse residents from following the rules, regardless of their race or any other protected characteristic.

    Don’t let your fear of a fair housing claim prevent you from applying your policies fairly and consistently. If action is required, don’t fail to act because you’re afraid the resident will file a fair housing complaint against you. Just talk to your attorney first to make sure that all of your community’s actions are documented and justified.

    Example: In 2013, a Washington public housing community fought off a fair housing complaint filed by a resident who was threatened with eviction for feeding pigeons and allowing them to nest on his deck. The community’s rules prohibited the feeding of stray animals and wildlife, so he received several warnings that he’d be evicted if he didn’t stop. He eventually complied and no further action was taken against him, but the resident sued the community for discriminating against him because of his race. He failed to prove that he was being falsely accused since he admitted that he allowed the pigeons to nest on his deck. And the court rejected his claim that nonminority residents fed the pigeons and were not disciplined, noting that other residents viewed the pigeons as a nuisance and were trying to get rid of them in various ways, including poison [Bahati v. Seattle Housing Authority, September 2013].

    To ward off fair housing trouble, it’s a good idea to have a written policy detailing your standards of conduct so all prospects, residents, and staff members understand what behaviors constitute lease violations. Putting it down on paper heads off claims that the resident didn’t know about the rules or understand the consequences of breaking them.

    Make sure that your rules conform to state and local requirements by asking your attorney for help in drafting a policy that defines what conduct is considered a lease violation. Make the rules as specific as possible—for example, by quantifying how many times an act must be committed before it’s considered a lease violation, how much time you’ll give a resident to correct his behavior, and so on. Your policy should also detail the procedures for investigating, resolving, and documenting complaints against residents for violating the lease and community rules.

    Over the next couple weeks, MHCO will be posting articles that go into detail on the remaining 7 rules for dealing with residents who break the rules.

    RULE #2: 

    DO Apply Community Rules Fairly and Consistently

    DON’T Make Exceptions for Residents Simply Because You Like Them

    RULE #3:

    DO Be Prepared for Reasonable Accommodation Requests

    DON’T Ignore Disability-Related Requests for Exceptions to the Rules

    RULE #4:

    DO Consider Accommodation Requests for Assistance Animals

    DON’T Refuse to Make Any Exception to Pet Policies

    RULE #5: 

    DO Enforce Rules to Prevent Harassment, Maintain Safety 

    DON’T Ignore Accommodation Requests Related to Disruptive Conduct 

    RULE #6: 

    DO Enforce Rules Governing Common Areas

    DON’T Unreasonably Limit Children’s Activities

    RULE #7:

    DO Be Prepared for Potential Retaliation Claims

    DON’T Crack Down Because of a Prior Fair Housing Complaint 

    RULE #8: 

    DO Keep Good Records to Counter Discrimination, Retaliation Claims 

    DON’T Neglect Your Paperwork 

    Phil Querin Q&A: Applicant Qualifies, Moves In, Does not Sign Rental Agreement

    Phil Querin

    Answer: First and foremost, send the checks back as soon as they come in. Do not hold onto them, as there is Oregon case law saying that doing so for an unreasonable amount of time can constitute acceptance. Include a letter with the checks reiterating what you told him about the necessity of the repairs and the need to sign the rental agreement. I hope the nature of the repairs and the amount of time he has to complete them are a part of the rental agreement. IF not they should be. The only real way to enforce this requirement is to make the repairs a written condition of the tenancy. Do not accept any rent from him unless and until the tenant has signed the rental agreement and it contains an explicit description of the work he is to do and a completion date. If he takes possession without having signed a written rental agreement, you may give him a 24-hour notice to terminate under ORS 90.403. The statute contemplates an improper subleasing arrangement which is not the case here. However, in all respects, it should work, since his possession is unauthorized and in possession without a signed rental agreement. Make sure that you use the proper form of notice, as this is not the same situation as giving a 24-hour notice for outrageous conduct under ORS 90.396. Alternatively, if you have rules in the community that prohibit occupancy without a written rental agreement, you could issue a 30-day notice under ORS 90.630(1)(b). That way, if he cured by signing the rental agreement (with the repair provision in it) he could stay. This second alternative, though more time consuming, gives him a chance to come into compliance before having to vacate.